Cadre normativ-instituționale ale construcției sociale a profesiei de consilier de probațiune în zona de N-E a României și în Republica Moldova [Institutional regulatory frameworks of the social construction of the probation counselor profession in N-E Romania and the Republic of Moldova]

Coperta Sociologie Românească 1/2016Sociologie Românească – Copyright © 2016

FORMAT | ARTICLE     

PAGES | 23-43       

LANGUAGE | English

ISSN| 1220-5389

HOW TO CITE|SANDU, Antonio (2016). Cadre normativ-instituționale ale construcției sociale a profesiei de consilier de probațiune în zona de N-E a României și în Republica Moldova [Institutional regulatory frameworks of the social construction of the probation counselor profession in N-E Romania and the Republic of Moldova]. Sociologie Românească, 14(1), 23-43.
Disponibil online la adresa : https://revistasociologieromaneasca.ro/sr/article/view/2016_1_sandu

Pentru a citi articolul dați click aici


ABSTRACT:


The present article aims to analyse the institutional regulatory frameworks of the activity of probation counselors in Romania and the Republic of Moldova, and their impact on the social construction of the profession of probation counselor. The theoretical frameworks are pegged by the three paradigms on justice: retributive, restorative and humanistic (based on human rights). The model of probation implemented in the two states, according to the existing normative framework, is tributary to the retributive paradigm. We notice an intention of the legislator to harmonize the national legislation with the European frameworks in the field, by introducing certain regulatory frameworks based on restorative and humanistic justice, but there are also inconsistencies in tran-sposing those into normative frameworks of functioning of probation. The cultural context of the two countries is unfavorable for the social alternatives to imprisonment, the dominant mentality being highly retributive. The epistemic and axiological frameworks of the probation services in Ro-mania and the Republic of Moldova are generally tributary to the prisonocentric paradigm, belon-ging to the model of retributive justice. The probation system is generally seen as an alternative to imprisonment, and less as an alternative to the punishment. We must notice that the regulatory pro-gress of the Romanian system of juvenile justice, which eliminates the idea of punishment applied to the minors, the sanctioning measures applied, including the custodial ones are considered educa-tional measures, not punitive ones.


KEYWORDS:

restorative justice; probation; institutional regulatory frameworks; social construction of probation.


BAZE DE DATE:

Disponibil în PROQUEST aici

Disponibil în SSRN aici

Disponibil în CEEOL aici